Can A Border Fence Curb Illegal Immigration?

10 March 2006 - 12:00pm

Robert Sameulson is uneasy about advocating a fence along the U.S.-Mexico border but believes it may be a way to curb illegal immigration.

"It's time to build a real fence or a wall along every foot of the 1,989 miles of the U.S.-Mexican border...I do not like advocating a fence. It looks and feels bad. It's easily stigmatized as racist. It would antagonize Mexico. The imagery is appalling, but it beats the alternative: a growing underclass and social tensions. Moreover, a genuine fence would probably work. The construction of about 10 miles of steel and concrete barriers up to 15 feet high in San Diego has reduced illegal crossings in that sector...Sure, there will be tunnels and ladders. But getting in will be harder. Policing will be easier. We also need to stiffen employer fines for hiring illegal aliens...There's a paradox. To make immigration succeed, we need to curb some immigration. That's why it's vital to control our border."

Source: The Washington Post Writers Group, March 8, 2006
Bookmark and Share
All of that only scratches the surface of what's wrong with this study. The idea that complex urban development patterns and human behavior can be meaningfully studied according to one primary criteria — density — is wrong from the start.