Supreme Court Should Protect Upstream Waters
24 February 2006 - 10:00am
Boston Globe editorial supports protection for upstream wetlands.
"The Roberts court can demonstrate its respect for Supreme Court precedents by finding two Michigan developers' intrusions on wetlands in violation of the Clean Water Act..At issue in the Michigan cases is whether Congress in the 1972 Clean Water Act meant to protect just 'navigable waters' and abutting streams and wetlands, or the upstream wetlands that feed into them as well...A federal appeals court has ruled against both Michigan developers."
Full Story:
Protect upstream waters
Source:
The Boston Globe, February 22, 2006
Related links:
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Driving Species to Extinction - Jan 22, 2012
- Freedom Bulbs and the Political Debate on Climate Change - Jan 21, 2012
- Your Prius Won't Save You - Jan 14, 2012
- The Rental Boost From Green Design - Jan 10, 2012
- EPA Issues 'State of the Environment' Photo Challenge - Jan 09, 2012
“
The goals of densification, infill, and containment may be generally appropriate for U.S. cities, but not for cities in the developing world where average urban population densities are over four times higher than in the U.S.
”

















