Supreme Court Should Protect Upstream Waters

24 February 2006 - 10:00am

Boston Globe editorial supports protection for upstream wetlands.

"The Roberts court can demonstrate its respect for Supreme Court precedents by finding two Michigan developers' intrusions on wetlands in violation of the Clean Water Act..At issue in the Michigan cases is whether Congress in the 1972 Clean Water Act meant to protect just 'navigable waters' and abutting streams and wetlands, or the upstream wetlands that feed into them as well...A federal appeals court has ruled against both Michigan developers."

Source: The Boston Globe, February 22, 2006
Bookmark and Share
The goals of densification, infill, and containment may be generally appropriate for U.S. cities, but not for cities in the developing world where average urban population densities are over four times higher than in the U.S.