An Evaluation of Metropolitan Planning Organization Boards
Is there an inherent bias in the geographic and racial-ethnic patterns of Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) boards?
Metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) are often the conduit through which billions of federal and state transportation dollars flow for regional transportation investments. Decisions by MPOs have important ramifications for metropolitan growth patterns and, by implication, social and economic opportunity. Yet, the decisions are made by boards whose members are generally not elected to serve on the MPO. Further, MPOs are not required by law to have representational voting. The potential exists, therefore, for MPO decisions to be biased toward certain constituencies or locales at the expense of others. This policy brief reviews MPOs generally and discusses the variation in MPO voting structures—with implications for potential bias—in 50 large metropolitan areas.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- What the Feds are Doing to Connect Housing Policy to Health Policy - Feb 13, 2012
- NYT Editorial Blasts House Transportation Bill - Feb 10, 2012
- House and Senate Transportation Bills on a Collision Course - Feb 08, 2012
- The Obama Administration's Crusade for Homeowners - Feb 07, 2012
- A Federal Assault on Transit - Feb 06, 2012

















