CA Redevelopment Head Weighs in on Kelo
Law, public perception, and public benefit diverge in the wake of the Kelo decision. John Shirey attempts to explain what Kelo does -- and does not -- mean for redevelopment and its use of eminent domain.
"We were afraid that the Supreme Court might not only overturn the Connecticut Supreme Court’s initial Kelo decision but also issue some sort of sweeping opinion that would jeopardize the use of eminent domain nation-wide. So there was relief that the Court ruled in favor of the City of New London. However, none of us were prepared for the adverse public reaction that followed.
"That adverse public reaction has been manifested in nearly every statehouse in the country and in the United States Congress and, consequently, we’re now facing serious attempts to eliminate or greatly curtail the ability of redevelopment agencies to use eminent domain for redevelopment. In retrospect, while we were relieved to see the way the decision went, we would have been better off if we had lost."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Using Adaptive Reuse to Scale the Urban Future - Feb 08, 2012
- The Obama Administration's Crusade for Homeowners - Feb 07, 2012
- Toward a More Inclusive Planning Process - Feb 07, 2012
- A Case Study of Apple Shows Why The US Can't Compete Globally - Jan 23, 2012
- The Innovations Building the Next Economy in 2012 - Jan 18, 2012

















