Is Joel Kotkin Flip-Flopping On Portland Criticism?
14 December 2005 - 9:00am
Joseph Cortright offers a rebuttal to Joel Kotkin's criticism of Portland as an 'Ephemeral City'.
"When you read Kotkin's concept of the Ephemeral City, ask yourself which Joel Kotkin you should believe: the one who wrote this piece for The Oregonian, or the one who wrote pretty much the opposite in a report for St. Louis last year and in his 2000 book, "The New Geography: How the Digital Revolution is Reshaping the American Landscape."
...There's a difference between the deft turn of a phrase and thoughtful scholarship. How can Kotkin come down with such assured conviction on both sides of these questions? Maybe he's just confused."
Source:
The Oregonian, December 14, 2005
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- All it Takes is a Little Paint - Nov 29, 2011
- TOD Landmark Still Can't Get People Out of Their Cars - Oct 12, 2011
- Portland Approves Plan to Preserve Large Areas as Rural - Aug 22, 2011
- The Paradox of Minimum Parking Requirements for Bars and Taverns - Jul 22, 2011
- Evidence That Smart Growth Strategies Curb Emissions - May 31, 2011
“
These practices are also inequitable since they force non-drivers to subsidize parking costs, reduce travel options for non-drivers, and reduce housing affordability.
”


















response
you would think someone as intelligent of cortright could think on his own than to dredge up the same stuff richard florida did when I first
raised criticism of his idea.
the new geography foreshadowed most of my current ideas. the second chapter was called 'the anti-urban impulse' and spoke about dispersion as the primary factor of the digital economy. it is there i coined the phrase nerdistan,
second, in reference to cities, i raised the issue of childless 'boutique cities' later in the book. i said they could do well, but
would lose much of the traditional function of cities.the ephemeral concept is a natural outgrowth.
finally, it is true that i have learned things since 2000. the experience of the last 5 years suggests that the dispersion patterns --- to the periphery, countryside and abroad --- have accelerated more than I anticipated. there is nothing wrong from learning from greater knowledge.
indeed the whole 'flip flop' attack is the kind of thing you see in politics when a politician doesn't want to engage an issue. i am sure i can take something out of context from any writer and compare it to something else. it is the essential message that needs to stay somewhat consistent and, more important, bolstered by fact and rational argument.
joel
Question
Joel,
When I read your article I could see the issues that you were discussing, no major economic growth in the city, no affordable housing, not a lot of families, and etc. But the issue I thought of while reading it was that what makes Portland have to have all of the things that you stated they were missing? I am not saying that either way is the best way, but it seems that they have become the city that they sought out to be and they dont have to deal with so many of the problems that face most major American cities.
If you have any insight on this, I would appreciate hearing back.