Inner Cities Losing Jobs

30 November 2005 - 8:00am

Despite a variety of federal and state programs, most inner cities lost jobs at an alarming rate.

"Nearly half of the country's 82 largest municipalities lost jobs from 1995 to 2003, according to a new Harvard University study. By comparison, only one of the surrounding metropolitan areas lost jobs during the same period.

A separate analysis by The Associated Press found that most inner cities targeted by the federal government's primary urban economic programs lost jobs as well."

Source: Yahoo! News, November 28, 2005

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Misleading burb, misleading story

How is "nearly half" the nation's largest cities (the number used in the story) losing some jobs the same as "most inner cities" losing jobs? "Nearly half" or even "half" is less than "most" in the English language as written in the United States.

And what does it mean to say a place is losing jobs "at an alarming rate"? What's a "non-alarming" rate?

Substantively, the story is strange because the measuring period (1995-2003) is a bit unfair -in 2003 the economy was still recovering from the 2000-02 recession. I suspect if that the story had used 1995-2001 as the baseline period, or 1992-2003 (from recession to recession) the results would be somewhat rosier.

Bookmark and Share
Maybe we should blame Thomas Jefferson. He was the godfather of the urban sprawl racket in America.