Experts Warn Eminent Domain Limits Could Block Redevelopment
28 November 2005 - 10:00am
Restrictions on eminent domain in the wake of the public furor over Kelo may restrict abilities of cities to practice redevelopment.
"The U.S. Supreme Court earlier this year upheld the right of local governments to seize private property to spur economic development. Since then, Congress and at least 38 states have moved to defend property rights. Some experts warn the flurry of new legislation could block necessary development projects." This story examines waterfront redevelopment issues in Portland, Maine in the wake of Kelo v. New London."
Source:
National Public Radio - Morning Edition, November 25, 2005
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Measuring the Carbon Footprint of New Development - Jan 22, 2008
- Coastal Development Strangling Ocean Life In New England - Dec 30, 2006
- The Last Retailer Standing - Nov 29, 2006
- To Build Or Not To Build? - Oct 27, 2006
- Portland, Maine, To Develop New Neighborhood - Oct 10, 2006
“
New Suburbanism is not a new design paradigm that seeks to compete with or discredit principles of New Urbanism. Instead, our perspective represents a broad-based attempt to find the best, most practical ways to develop and redevelop suburban communities.
”




















overstating?
Almost all of the state level restictions that are being discussed involve limiting the ability for municipalities to use pure economic development as a sole justification for eminent domain. If an area truly needs redevelopment, it shouldn't be too hard to at least get a finding of blight.
In reality, these restirctions won't limit all but the most severely marginal cases of eminent domain one bit.