Consider Two Facts Before Rebuilding New Orleans
12 September 2005 - 6:00am
Klaus Jacob argues that we must face scientific facts before planning New Orleans' future.
"It is time to swim against the tide. The direction of public discourse in the wake of Katrina goes like this: First we save lives and provide some basic assistance to the victims. Then we clean up New Orleans. And then we rebuild the city.
Most will rightly agree on the first two. But should we rebuild New Orleans, 10 feet below sea level, just so it can be wiped out again?"
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- New Orleans to Explore Dutch Approach to Water Management - Jun 10, 2011
- Mississippi River Course Change Likely - May 25, 2011
- Rethinking New Orleans' Levees - Aug 05, 2010
- Interference with Delta Geography Enabled Katrina's Devastation - Mar 31, 2010
- Thousands of Miles of Mississippi Delta Lost to Sea Level Rise by 2100 - Jul 06, 2009
“
All of that only scratches the surface of what's wrong with this study. The idea that complex urban development patterns and human behavior can be meaningfully studied according to one primary criteria — density — is wrong from the start.
”

















