City's Obsession With Safety Is Dangerous
23 August 2005 - 10:00am
Many regulations that are well-meaning end up frustrating the ability of planners to build an interesting engaging city, writes Christopher Hume.
"Though no one would disagree safety must be paramount, it shouldn't be used as an excuse to hamper the proper or at least the desired evolution of Toronto.Yet as many architects, landscape architects, planners and even politicians will tell you, just below the surface of official plans, design guidelines and so on there's a layer of rules and regulations that thwarts our best intentions."
Full Story:
City free of risk, but at what cost
Source:
The Toronto Star, August 11, 2005
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- The Burden of Frederick Law Olmsted - Feb 08, 2012
- Taking Parking Lots Seriously, as Public Spaces - Jan 07, 2012
- 2012's Big Urban Projects - Jan 02, 2012
- Security Perimeter Design Gets A Facelift - Dec 19, 2011
- CMG Landscape Architecture CEO on Multiple New Projects - Nov 22, 2011
“
This is in fact the kind of self-sufficient, self-sustaining 'village' community that Mahatma Gandhi -- the Father of the Nation -- dreamt of and wrote about in his books on India’s path to development.
”

















