Should Public Buildings Be Used For Innovation?

17 March 2005 - 9:00am

The incomplete lesson of the Sydney Opera House may provide guidance for using iconic public buildings as sites of technological innovation.

Paolo Tombesi poses the question of what the functions of "large public buildings are or should be -- a question that still resonates in the case of the Sydney Opera House as well as many of its younger siblings.

...How should we look at and assess these extraordinary structures? As opportunities for unique works of art, vehicles for the production of collective identity, cultural billboards, or privileged laboratories for disseminable industrial research? The alternatives presented, of course, imply another question: What makes a public building significant—its presence, its development process, its effects?

...The issue is tricky, because the theory and practice of civic works send out conflicting signals."

Source: Harvard Design Magazine, March 17, 2005
Bookmark and Share
The areas where we have severe blight and indications of more blight to come are basically the same as they ever were. How in the world are we ever going to move our community development selves into an alternative future that thinks differently about the challenges we face in our cities and low-income suburban and rural communities?