Can The Supreme Court Stop The Spread Of Blight?
2 March 2005 - 7:00am
Reason magazine weighs in on the troubling implications of Kelo v. New London. Will any property be secure?
"Defending the condemnation of homes and businesses to make way for a grandiose redevelopment plan that includes a luxury hotel, condominiums, a health club, office space, and a riverside esplanade, the city of New London, Connecticut, points to the taxes it expects these upscale properties to generate. If the prospect of higher tax revenue justifies the forced transfer of property from one owner to another, O'Connor asked, would it be appropriate for a city to decide that a Motel 6 must give way to a Ritz-Carlton?
'Yes, your honor, it would be,' replied Wesley Horton, New London's lawyer."
Full Story:
Revolting Development
Source:
Reason Online, February 25, 2005
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Long-Awaited Bus Project Finally Gets Funding - Nov 29, 2011
- New London's Big Gamble and Big Loss - Jan 04, 2010
- Inspiration for Kelo Case Leaves Town - Nov 15, 2009
- New London, Four Years After Kelo - Nov 13, 2009
- Outdated Zoning Stymies Development - Aug 08, 2009
“
New Suburbanism is not a new design paradigm that seeks to compete with or discredit principles of New Urbanism. Instead, our perspective represents a broad-based attempt to find the best, most practical ways to develop and redevelop suburban communities.
”


















