TOD Is Great, But Where Do We Park?
19 February 2005 - 11:00am
Transit-oriented development is a necessary but not sufficient precondition to more transit ridership, writes Bill Fulton.
"Throughout California, transit-oriented development (TOD) is the rage. ...Concentrating new housing and commercial development around the growing number of rail transit stations in California will help accommodate the need for new growth while minimizing the traffic impact.
That's the theory anyway. Opponents of the TOD concept say that it won't work. Even when development is concentrated around rail stops, they argue, nobody rides the rails. Everybody still drives. So all TODs will do is create new auto traffic congestion points - around rail stops nobody uses.
So who's right?"
Source:
California Planning and Development Report, February 18, 2005
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Can An Electric Bike Replace A Car? - Feb 11, 2012
- Mayor Outlines "Plan B" To Push Through Transit Improvements in L.A. - Feb 02, 2012
- Reinventing Los Angeles: Seizing the Transit Opportunity - Feb 01, 2012
- Has Gov. Jerry Brown Solved California's High Speed Rail Problems? - Jan 30, 2012
- California Passes Historic Zero Emission Vehicle Regulations - Jan 30, 2012
“
Maybe we should blame Thomas Jefferson. He was the godfather of the urban sprawl racket in America.
”


















