TOD Is Great, But Where Do We Park?
19 February 2005 - 11:00am
Transit-oriented development is a necessary but not sufficient precondition to more transit ridership, writes Bill Fulton.
"Throughout California, transit-oriented development (TOD) is the rage. ...Concentrating new housing and commercial development around the growing number of rail transit stations in California will help accommodate the need for new growth while minimizing the traffic impact.
That's the theory anyway. Opponents of the TOD concept say that it won't work. Even when development is concentrated around rail stops, they argue, nobody rides the rails. Everybody still drives. So all TODs will do is create new auto traffic congestion points - around rail stops nobody uses.
So who's right?"
Source:
California Planning and Development Report, February 18, 2005
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Denser Neighborhoods Could Save Bay Area $31 Billion - Nov 23, 2009
- Broad Plan to Reshape San Francisco's Skyline - Nov 23, 2009
- Alternative Fuels Won't Change the Expense of Driving - Nov 20, 2009
- HSR Too Slow? Blame CEQA - Nov 19, 2009
- Cycling: It's About Individualism? - Nov 19, 2009
“
The circumstances that many localities and planning departments are suffering in the current economic winter will no doubt generate stress on administrations and service levels. The economy, combined with the housing bubble, has dealt a double blow to local budgets and revenue streams.
”

















