What Would It Take To Make Toronto Beautiful?
8 February 2005 - 11:00am
Lisa Rochon hosts a roundtable conversation to examine the reasons for the city's architectural mediocrity.
A panel of leading Toronto architects including Ken Greenberg, Don Schmitt, Bruce Kuwabara, Janet Rosenberg and Siamak Hariri outline the systemic and other factors they believe are responsible for Toronto's failure to foster quality urban design. These include a lack of a design champion, a fractured council with no executive branch, an inability for decision makers to think long term, and a planning tool kit that contains the wrong tools. The panel members relate their experiences working abroad, drawing comparisons between how the planning process operates in Toronto versus other world cities.
Source:
The Globe and Mail, February 7, 2005
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- In Toronto, Height is Secondary - Dec 23, 2011
- Developers of "Cool Roof" Buildings May Catch a Break - Nov 09, 2011
- The Architecture of Openness - Mar 31, 2011
- "Podiumism" and it's Discontents - Mar 26, 2011
- Toronto's Concrete City Hall, and its Concrete Furniture - Mar 05, 2011
“
For the past half century we have been building communities for the wrong reasons. We built them to sell cars. This created all sorts of problems.
”


















