Essential Public Facilities: Protection Against NIMBYism?
10 October 2004 - 9:00am
What saved Seattle's light rail project?
"A little-known provision of the state Growth Management Act probably saved Sound Transit's Seattle light-rail project from a serious perhaps fatal setback recently...[Essential public facilities are "those facilities that are typically difficult to site" ...things that everyone agrees we need but that no one wants as a neighbor.
The law gives such facilities special protection, severely limiting local governments' power to say no to them.
Source:
The Seattle Times, October 10, 2004
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Six Trending Urbanist Themes for the New Year - Dec 31, 2011
- Sharrow Backlash - Are They Working? - Nov 18, 2011
- Seattle May Revise Bike Plan, Already - Nov 03, 2011
- Nations Largest and Most Expensive Expansion Program - Nov 02, 2011
- More Streetcars for Seattle? - Oct 10, 2011
“
The decision to abandon a property is a symptom of the loss of confidence. And while abandonment certainly affects confidence among surrounding homeowners, the most important question to answer is not "how do we deal with abandoned properties?" but "what is the most cost-effective way to restore market confidence, and how do abandoned properties fit into that picture?"
”

















