Are Landmark Buildings Ruining Our Cities?
Should we care about what iconic buildings really contribute to the neighborhoods that surround them?
"As competition increases, each image has to be more extraordinary and shocking in order to eclipse the last. Each new design has to be instantly memorable - more iconic. This one-upmanship was, and is, a fatuous and self-indulgent game.
Perhaps we should ask some simple questions before handing out more money and plaudits to "visionary" designers. What is the value of turning functional buildings into iconic ones? Are we simply trying too hard? Is a building's purpose compromised by its style? And what contribution does the icon make to its surroundings?"
"Although we talk of the "Bilbao effect" - how one remarkable building can change the way in which a city is perceived and boost its economy - there is little evidence to suggest that architecture in the form of a single gesture can really have such restorative powers."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Using Adaptive Reuse to Scale the Urban Future - Feb 08, 2012
- The Collapse of the Architecture Profession - Feb 06, 2012
- A Reality Check for Architects - Jan 19, 2012
- The Challenges of Building A House on Mars - Jan 09, 2012
- Taking Parking Lots Seriously, as Public Spaces - Jan 07, 2012

















