The Power Of Land Use And Transportation

13 September 2004 - 12:00am

The federal government can play a transformative rather than divisive role if it becomes a better partner in land use, housing - and especially transportation.

Photo: Earl Blumenauer

Regardless of the outcome of the November 2 election, America will continue to be a deeply divided nation. Whether we live in a polarized "non-battle ground state" or one that is currently being fiercely contested, most of us hold strong feelings about who should be our next President. But what happens after the election? How will we recover from one of the most intense, heated, and expensive presidential elections in our history? How will we be able to bring people together on critical policy decisions that will affect us, both as individuals and as a nation?

Because of these deep divisions, I am convinced that the critical issue of how to create livable communities is going to be more important than ever. While we may be polarized on foreign policy, the economy, prescription drugs, and social issues, there is a vast array of policy decisions that have the potential to bring the American people together. The federal government can play a transformative rather than divisive role if it becomes a better partner in disaster preparedness, land use, housing -- and especially transportation. As more and more Americans understand the fundamental building blocks of livable communities - places where our families are safe, healthy, and economically secure - we will find tremendous similarities among communities large and small, conservative and liberal, urban and rural, throughout our nation.

The 10th annual Rail~Volution (www.railvolution.com) conference will be held in Los Angeles September 18-22, 2004. This national event is the premier gathering of transportation, land use, affordable housing, citizen advocacy, local government, and development interests - people who are actively working to create more livable communities.

Southern California, especially the Los Angeles basin, has been the epicenter of planning and transportation issues for the past fifty years, as the Red Cars were dismantled and freeways and suburbs consumed valuable orchards and farmland.

Perhaps nowhere else in America is there a starker contrast between the challenges created by past policies and the opportunity for future redemption. Southern California is one of the most important economies in the world, contains a population density greater than New York City, and provides examples -- good and bad -- of virtually every transportation and housing issue in our nation. In short, Los Angeles is this decade's most important laboratory for livability; how its residents and elected officials are fitting the pieces together has profound consequences for all of America. From new rail construction to an explosion of downtown housing, Los Angeles is poised, once again, to be at the forefront of American trends. We need to be sure that it is headed in the right direction.

Last October 1, the federal Surface Transportation Act expired. Fifty weeks later, reauthorization has been a day-to-day frustration on Capitol Hill. From Chambers of Commerce, road builders, environmentalists and bicyclists to garden clubs, architects, and historic preservationists, the broadest coalition ever assembled on behalf of any infrastructure legislation has united to support this significant reinvestment in our transportation system.

In the thirteen years since the passage of ISTEA (Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act) in 1991, an increasing number of Americans have come to appreciate the critical role that flexible transportation funding has played in the revitalization and enhancement of communities all across the nation. Now, however, the Bush administration's insistence on an inadequate funding level, coupled with conflicting congressional crosscurrents, has relegated transportation funding to a series of limited extension bills.

Americans may hold strong partisan feelings about the upcoming election, yet we are united as never before in our desire to create communities where families are safe, healthy, and economically secure. This year's conference in Los Angeles is perhaps our best opportunity to pull these pieces together, equipping us for the challenges of what will happen beginning on November 3, regardless of who occupies the White House for the next four years.


Congressman Earl Blumenauer (OR-3) has devoted his entire career to public service. He first served in the Oregon House of Representatives in 1972. From there Mr. Blumenauer went on to be a Multnomah County Commissioner and spent ten years on the Portland City Council as Commissioner of Public Works. Mr. Blumenauer's reforms and innovative accomplishments have helped his hometown of Portland, Oregon gain an international reputation as a livable community. Congressman Blumenauer was elected to Congress in 1996 and is the founder of the Congressional Livable Communities Task Force.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Schneider's complaint..

I've attended Rail-Volution conferences. Their focus is not solely light rail as much as how 'any' mass transit technology can have positive affects toward creating pedestrian-friendly development and Main Street economics.

Like Jerry Schneider, am critical of Seattle's Link light rail project and must warn light rail advocates that Link is a worst case example of how NOT to build light rail.

Because Link bypasses the only major destination on the route to Seatac airport, (South Center - Tukwila's commercial core), the opportunity to direct regional development there is forever lost. Also lost is Link ridership in the reverse-commute direction and off-rush hours.

Thus, Link serves commuters primarily and does little to reduce need for commuting and long-distance travel, assuring a traffic increase beyond Link AND roaday capacity.

Directing transit-oriented development at South Center would create jobs, services and amenities that could reduce Tukwila area resident's need for long-distance travel. Link will backfire because Seattle planners learned little from Rail-Volution.

The Link LRT maintenance facility now under construction in SoDo could be used for streetcar system expansion. For more inexplicable reasons, Seattle planners decided to not utilize the compatable rail in the downtown tunnel to route the Lake Union Streetcar, even though the Waterfront Streetcar line could also connect and extend the entire streetcar system as far north as Interbay, where, whoops, monorail was chosen to be routed; nevermind that monorail via the 'East Alternative' would serve more than twice the number of people and initiate more than twice the amount of development.

Congressman Blumenaur. You've done excellent work in these regards and I commend you. But please, Seattle's opportunity to build effective mass transit and guide future development is being abused. How can Seattle, so close to Portland's example, make these obvious mistakes unwittingly? Please do something to help. Route improvement is possible, as when rejected S/N MAX was replaced with I-MAX.

Rail~Volution

I hope the conference attendees will receive information about the rail transit program being conducted by Sound Transit in Seattle. It represents a massive failure to meet the needs of one of the most congested cities in the U.S. Transportation activist E. Bundy has compared Sound Transit's promises with their performance as quoted below:

"PROMISE: A 7.8-mile light rail line from the Seattle City limit to SeaTac Airport and South 200th, with five stations, completed in mid-2006, for $315 million ($1995), or $425 million ($YOE). This is taken directly from the Sound Move report done in 1996.

PERFORMANCE: A 4-9 mile light rail line from the Seattle City limit to the edge of Tukwila, South 154th, with a solitary station, completed in late 2009, for $670 million. Sound Transit's latest estimate for the remainder of the line to South 200th near the SeaTac airport is $470 million which itself is likely an underestimate. But, accepting it, that's a total cost of $1.14 billion, 2.7 times the original estimate. How does a cost overrun of this magnitude contribute to the livability of highly congested Seattle? And even then this rail transit segment will have only three stations instead of the promised five. Source: Sound Transit's 2004 Financial Plan."

If this rail segment is actually built as presently envisioned, will it reduce congestion? It's effect on congestion will be like that of tearing a page out of a telephone book -a tiny, tiny value for the scarce transportation dollar.

Much better alternatives are available but you certainly won't hear about them at this conference.

Bookmark and Share

Related News Stories

    There are currently no posts in this category.

It's all too easy for projects to claim that they will be successful places, and all too hard to tell ahead of time which ones actually will.