Don't Replace Seattle's Viaduct
15 April 2004 - 9:00am
A citizen's group proposes reconnecting the waterfront to the city instead of replacing the viaduct.
The people's waterfront coalition proposes that the "viaduct should be torn down ... but building a replacement would be too expensive and disruptive. Instead, the group has proposed "a package of smaller projects to keep traffic moving through downtown without the viaduct. They include reconfiguring Interstate 5, improving downtown arterials and signal timing, expanding transit, and adopting tolls and other strategies to discourage driving."
Full Story:
Viaduct option: Don't replace it
Source:
The Seattle Times, April 14, 2004
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- In Seattle, Feelings are Mixed on Extra Perks for "Ultra-Green" Building Standards - Oct 21, 2011
- Faking It: Imitations of Cities Around the Globe - Sep 09, 2011
- "Living Building" Vision Comes to Life - Sep 02, 2011
- Washington Towns Reimagine Waterfronts - Jun 11, 2011
- Green Development in Seattle Hits it Out of the Park - Jun 07, 2011
“
Maybe we should blame Thomas Jefferson. He was the godfather of the urban sprawl racket in America.
”


















