Don't Replace Seattle's Viaduct
15 April 2004 - 9:00am
A citizen's group proposes reconnecting the waterfront to the city instead of replacing the viaduct.
The people's waterfront coalition proposes that the "viaduct should be torn down ... but building a replacement would be too expensive and disruptive. Instead, the group has proposed "a package of smaller projects to keep traffic moving through downtown without the viaduct. They include reconfiguring Interstate 5, improving downtown arterials and signal timing, expanding transit, and adopting tolls and other strategies to discourage driving."
Full Story:
Viaduct option: Don't replace it
Source:
The Seattle Times, April 14, 2004
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Reclaiming Alleyways - Oct 08, 2009
- Tent Cities As 'Informal Urbanism' - Apr 09, 2009
- Quit Playing it Safe, Seattle! - Nov 06, 2008
- New Heights for Seattle's Public Art - Oct 03, 2008
- Prefab Apartments Slated For Seattle - May 27, 2008
“
In short, we’ve seen the last of the cheap oil on which we’ve built our economy, our communities, and our daily lives.
”



















