Is Public Housing Worth Saving?
As Seattle embarks on four HOPE VI projects, the program's philosophy remains questionable and its future uncertain.
Guest columnist Howard Husock warns Seattle, and all recipients of HOPE VI funds, that the success of the public housing rehabilitation program was constructed on shaky assumptions. The HOPE VI program seeks to rectify the concentration of poverty that often results with public housing projects by attempting to mix the poor with the non-poor. "The stakes are high: It can well be anticipated that, if maintenance declines, middle-income families will desert the development, leaving behind the feared concentration of poverty." Husock also questions the work ethic that subsidized housing inspires, and the sageness of cities dedicating land to low-income housing for perpetuity.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Six Trending Urbanist Themes for the New Year - Dec 31, 2011
- Placemaking Is Key To Job Creation, Says Politician - Jul 21, 2011
- Injured Cyclists Team Up to Fund Fix for Heavy Accident Area - Jul 02, 2011
- Bikeable and Walkable, But Room to Improve - May 26, 2011
- Giving Communal Housing A Shot - Mar 30, 2011

















