Do Lifestyle Centers Hijack New Urbanism?
17 November 2003 - 3:00pm
Cleveland architecture critic says new shopping center is "high end roadside kitsch"
"The $147 million development is a sugary-sweet confection of architecture and planning that's packed with empty calories. In truth, Legacy Village is a shopping center in the midst of a vast parking lot. But it pretends to be much, much more.... Legacy Village is neither a legacy nor a village. The Main Street environment is a tease, an architectural bait-and-switch intended to make visitors overlook how hard it really is to get around on foot."
Full Story:
New center can't live up to promise of its name
Source:
The Cleveland Plain Dealer, November 16, 2003
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- One of Bucky Fuller's Most Realized Domes, Revitalized - Nov 13, 2011
- Can Cincinnati Create a Truly Urban Casino? - Oct 31, 2011
- The New Trend in Highways: Capping Them - Oct 28, 2011
- Place Overpowers Bunkers in Cleveland's Post-9/11 Projects - Aug 19, 2011
- Football Team's Cleveland Plans Could Learn from the Past and Public - Apr 22, 2011
“
The following list shows the top 10 metropolitan statistical areas, as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget, where commuting by public transportation has grown the most. None of them are among the nation's top 10 most populous metro areas, and yet seven are within the top 20.
”


















