Do SUVs Cause More Wear and Tear Than Others?
Do sport utility vehicles cause more wear and tear on roads than cars? The mayor of Chicago thinks so; engineers disagree.
"Mayor Daley's plan to sock it to the owners of sport utility vehicles with a $90 city sticker fee is based on a false premise: that vehicles weighing over 4,500 pounds cause more wear and tear on roads than cars. Engineering and transportation experts...insisted that roads are typically designed for heavy trucks that weigh 'at least double,' if not 10 times what an SUV does." A professor of civil and architectural engineering at IIT commented: " 'Don't get me wrong, I don't like SUVs. They're wasteful vehicles that contribute to greater air pollution, further deplete petroleum resources, take up parking spaces and intimidate other drivers. But if they're going to use an argument, they should use a rational argument. That one doesn't hold water. It doesn't contribute to the degradation of the roads any more than an ordinary passenger vehicle would.' "
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Midwest HSR Gets $186 Million Boost - Jan 05, 2012
- The Largest Urban Park In America Coming To Chicago - Dec 20, 2011
- Chicago's Bikes and Rail Infrastructure Get Federal Boost - Dec 17, 2011
- Chicago River Finally Getting Cleaned Up - Dec 01, 2011
- Does the Chicago Parking Fee Actually Target Rush-Hour Parkers? - Nov 11, 2011

















