State Versus Local Planning
16 June 2000 - 12:30pm
An unintended consequence of Proposition 13, which limits local governments’ ability to impose taxes, is more State decisionmaking for local planning efforts.
There is an emerging pattern of state legislature intervention in local planning matters that, until recently, were previously handled by local government representatives. Examples of state intervention include development of a new LA County hospital in East Los Angeles, land use decisions in San Bernardino County, revisions to San Francisco's International airport, and others. Dan Walters asks if this is an appropriate role for state government.
Full Story:
Policy-making's upward shift
Source:
The Sacramento Bee, June 15, 2000
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Comprehensive Coverage of the End of Redevelopment in California - Feb 02, 2012
- Mayor Outlines "Plan B" To Push Through Transit Improvements in L.A. - Feb 02, 2012
- L.A. Might be Forced to Fix Its Crumbling Sidewalks - Jan 31, 2012
- California Moves Ahead With Streamlining of Envionmental Regulations - Jan 30, 2012
- California Passes Historic Zero Emission Vehicle Regulations - Jan 30, 2012
“
Its very unsuitability for an urban center justifies its current usage as a suburban or ex-urban pattern.
”
Planetizen picks
Contribute
- Waste Disposal Becomes Sexy
- Murky Future for Two of D.C.'s Architectural Gems
- The Story Behind One of the Most Controversial Buildings in the Country
- The Benefits of Creating Hybrid Zoning Codes
- The Appeal of In-Town Big Box
- The Growing Appeal of Drinking From the Toilet
- How and Why Does an Architect Become Famous?
- Could Good Design Have Prevented the Housing Crisis?
- NY Times Defends the Port Authority
- Expanding the Hong Kong Subway, One Blast at a Time
Volunteerism Plays Critical Role in Reaching World’s Millennium Development Goals
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University
Feb 10, 2012
www.flickr.com
|
