Sprawl Blamed For US Obesity
Compact forms of development are better for the environment and healthier, says a panel at the 11th annual CNU conference.
"Researchers presented more evidence yesterday blaming spread-out suburban development for America's obesity epidemic and for a variety of other public and mental health woes, allowing antisprawl activists to argue that new, compact forms of development would be better for the environment and also healthier for individuals... Suburban culture and monotonous landscapes can also make people depressed, Richard Jackson, director of environmental health at the Centers for Disease Control, told a gathering of planners and architects last night in Washington. Jackson's research was described as ''quantifying the malaise of sprawl,'' and links spread-out development with a parallel epidemic of several ills -- including poor nutrition, diabetes, and environmental illnesses."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Will a Liberated Workforce Still Need Cities? - Feb 09, 2012
- Mastering the Art of Stairway Persuasion - Feb 07, 2012
- The Obama Administration's Crusade for Homeowners - Feb 07, 2012
- Toward a More Inclusive Planning Process - Feb 07, 2012
- Public Transit's Gender Imbalance - Feb 02, 2012


















