A Real Debate On Growth In Arizona
26 May 2003 - 3:00am
Buckeye's recent vote to allow the largest subdivision in Arizona's history does nothing to settle questions about sprawl.
"The questions revolve not around 'growth' vs. 'no growth' but the complicated art of where to set the balance... The threat of hundreds of thousands of new houses should require the mother of all environmental-impact studies. Developers and residents should be taxed, with the money going to transit and center city projects. A Sonoran Desert Commission could regulate sprawl; that's how California kept its coast beautiful."
Source:
The Arizona Republic, May 25, 2003
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Shrinkage in Phoenix? Call it 'Smart Decline' - Dec 29, 2011
- Funding Permanent Housing for the Homeless in Tempe - Jun 20, 2010
- Building Boom In Land Of Foreclosures - May 17, 2010
- Deciding Which Homeowners To Bail Out - Mar 24, 2010
- Air Force Quashes Unborn NIMBYism in Arizona - Feb 04, 2010
“
For the past half century we have been building communities for the wrong reasons. We built them to sell cars. This created all sorts of problems.
”


















