Can Transit Link A Sprawling County?

Diana DeRubertis's picture

I've confirmed that it is possible to take public transportation to the most suburban of suburban locations: the outlet mall. San Diego might not have the best public transportation system in the world, but it is an option here, which is a step ahead of many American cities. To get to the Carlsbad Outlets, I hopped on the San Diego Trolley, transferred to the Coaster commuter rail and then transferred again to a north county bus line. Presto! Almost two and a half hours later, I'm at the outlets (the trip typically takes 20 minutes by car, if traffic is light).

I also confirmed that I am the only person in San Diego County who would take public transit to an outlet mall on a Saturday afternoon; my bus both to and from the train station was completely empty. Now, I didn't mind the trip for a leisurely day of shopping because the drive on I-5 is a headache even without a traffic jam. But multiple transit connections would clearly be a deal breaker for anyone on a tight schedule, especially morning commuters.

Ridership is high only in cities that offer truly comprehensive transit systems – for example, subway stops in every neighborhood and trains that run often. Anyone who has traveled to European cities knows that rail-only trips are the most convenient. Add a rail-to-bus connection and things start to get a little tedious.

Because San Diego County's built environment is so sprawling and chaotic, the only possible way to reach many destinations is by car or, at best, a rail-to-bus trip with multiple connections. Should we expect any mass transit system to deliver riders to the middle of nowhere, let alone quickly and efficiently?

And that's exactly the problem. As long as we continue to build in the middle of nowhere, the car will be default mode of transportation. Take for example 4S Ranch, the pseudo New Urbanist complex located on virtual wilderness land in Rancho Bernardo, 25 miles northeast of San Diego. I guarantee that almost no one who lives in these new developments is working in Rancho Bernardo; most are commuting by freeway to San Diego. (There is currently no rail service to this area, nor should there be, considering the location and autocentric design of this suburb).

This does not mean that transit can't work well over large distances. In the early 1900's, electric rail flourished in Los Angeles and San Diego because the lines connected distinct satellite villages, with development concentrated around rail stops. LA's Pacific Electric successfully linked downtown, Hollywood, Burbank, Pasadena, Santa Monica and Long Beach – not exactly a compact area. San Diego's streetcars covered all of the main attractions, including Balboa Park, Ocean Beach, Pacific Beach and La Jolla – none of which are served by rail today.

While the City of San Diego was on the right track when it unveiled its "City of Villages" smart growth strategy in 2002, San Diego County continues to allow a suburban sprawl free-for-all. The county is now investing billions to relieve freeway congestion caused by the number of office parks, malls and poorly planned housing complexes that are randomly scattered across the landscape. Unless the two governments can work together to realize a sane growth strategy, it's hard to envision an effective county-wide transit system anytime soon.

Diana DeRubertis is an environmental writer focusing on the urban planning field.

Comments

Comments

Sprawl/Smart Growth/Transit and the Suburbs

To what degree does the laissaiz-faire economic model of land speculation play in the present day sprawl we see in almost every US suburban and exurban region? My guess is, is that until we look at land differently, the speculators will continue to build anywhere they can make a profit. How their developments are linked to others or how their developments fit into a "desired" landscape will be of little importance.

Also, what are San Diego's building codes like? Are commercial enterprises allowed to co-exist with residential developments? This is something that needs to be resolved in order to allow people not only to live and work in proximity but to shop as well. This can eliminate some of the needs for cars.

Not in San Diego...

To say that one can ride over 2 hours to travel 20 miles is to completely admit that San Diego's transit system is non-functional and useless.

No serious commuters even think of taking the bus or trolley in San Diego. Los Angeles may be thought of as the poster child for sprawl, but San Diego is actually more auto-dependent than LA.

As for the "City of Villages" smart growth general plan update, the entire vision by Gail Goldberg went up in flames. This was due to the density component being rescinded by NIMBYist, anti-urban community planning groups, such as the Clairemont Mesa and Peninsula (Point Loma) Planning Committees.

Gail Goldberg even left her position as San Diego's Planning Director to become the head of the Planning Department in Los Angeles, due to such resistance and narrow-mindedness to smart growth on the part of most San Diegans.

So San Diego was NEVER on the "right track" with regards to smart growth, transit-oriented development, and increased densities. When you mention smart growth in San Diego planning/development circles nowadays, most people cringe in resistance.

San Diego Streetcars?

"San Diego’s streetcars covered all of the main attractions, including Balboa Park, Ocean Beach, Pacific Beach and La Jolla" - sounds great! Too bad it's gone now. I would love to take a streetcar to La Jolla.

Interesting journey. I've been testing the carfree lifestyle for over a year. I live in Del Mar and choose to do my shopping locally. It can be more expensive, but I consider it a trade-off for saving money from not owning a car. Less stress, more scenery.

San Diego And SB 375

I recently read that San Diego will be the first region to come up with a plan that conforms to SB375, which requires smart growth as one way of dealing with global warming.

I have heard lots of doubt about how effective SB375 will be. SD is apparently the first test, and maybe there is a chance of recovering some of its original transit-oriented character.

Needless to say, the NIMBYs will complain, but local law cannot override state law.

Charles Siegel

Update

I am curious about the progress of SB375 in San Diego. Do you have an update?

Prepare for the AICP Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $199
Planetizen Courses image ad

Planetizen Courses

Advance your career with subscription-based online courses tailored to the urban planning professional.
Starting at $14.95 a month
Wood necklace with city map

City Necklaces

These sweet pendants are engraved on a cedar charm with a mini map of selected cities. The perfect gift for friends and family or yourself!
$28.00
Book cover of Where Things Are from Near to Far

Where Things Are From Near to Far

This engaging children's book about planning illustrates that "every building has its place."
$19.95