Sustainable Development Needs To Embrace Technology

Samuel Staley's picture
Blogger

I've been spending a lot of time over the past couple of years examining the planning literature on sustainable development. Sustainable development, as a concept, remains vague. For those interested, take a look at my recent article in the journal Property Management.

But, does the practice of sustainable development provides real guidance for how we design communities and live? For example, is slowing down the rate of land development really a move toward sustainability? What's the difference if we run out of land in 300 years versus 500 years? At some point, real sustainability means that land must be recycled efficiently and effectively to accomodate future increases in population. Technology will be critical to achieving this, but its role is not necessarily embraced in the sustainability movement.

A case in point is agriculture and food production. The amount of farmland has been falling for decades. Headlines tend to blame sprawl. But, more farmland has been left fallow because of changes in technology than because urban land places a higher economic value on it. (For an analysis of this trend, see my policy brief here.) Improvements in technology have dramatically increased agricultural productivity, reducing the need for land and people to grow food. In short, the "foot print" for agriculture has become smaller. Technology, as a result, has changed very nature of what can be considered sustainable in food production--we're using less land (and other resources) in the U.S. and generating less demand for these resouces because of increases in productivity.

Unfortunately, the sustainable development literature, particularly that written in the environmental tradition, seems to focus on agricultural and food self-sufficiency as the goal of sustainable development policy. yet, self sufficiency, by its nature, implies a bigger environmental footprint and lower oveall productivity. Pursuing a food policy that focuses primarily on "home grown" food products may actually work against sustainability, both in terms of making the environmental footprint for agriculture larger as well as compromising our ability to sustain larger populations.

Sam Staley is Associate Director of the DeVoe L. Moore Center at Florida State University in Tallahassee.

Comments

Comments

Samuel Staley's picture
Blogger

Sustainable development isn't so sustainable

For those looking evidence on the unsustainability of sustainable agriculture, take a look at the report from the UK that found that organically grown tomatoes require six times more land than conventionally produced tomatoes. Organic milks requires 80 percent more land to produce one gallon. For the full study, http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20893.

Prepare for the AICP Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $199
Planetizen Courses image ad

Planetizen Courses

Advance your career with subscription-based online courses tailored to the urban planning professional.
Starting at $14.95 a month
Book cover of Insider's Guide to Careers in Urban Planning

So you want to be a planner...

Check out our behind the scenes look at 25 careers in the Urban Planning field
Starting at $14.95
poster

A Short History of America

From comic book artist Robert Crumb, poster shows how the built environment has changed throughout the decades.
$14.95