Lisa W. Foderaro reports: “'QueensWay' [is being reconceived as a] would-be linear park for walkers and bicyclists in an area desperate for more parkland and, with the potential for art installations, performances and adjacent restaurants, a draw for tourists interested in sampling the famously diverse borough.” Many feel the project is long overdue and supporters like Will Rogers, president and chief executive officer of the Trust for Public Land, say that “[i]t’s Queens’s turn” to soak in some of New York City's limelight.
Though potential obstacles include fund raising challenges, Foderaro highlights progress already made: "the trust has already raised tens of thousands of dollars for the project, in addition to the state grant [that will fund a community planning survey and feasibility study].” She also vets the land trust's capacity, adding that “it has broad experience in fostering linear parks, having worked on four dozen such parks, mostly on ground level, around the country," including the Bloomingdale Trail, an elevated railway to park conversion in Chicago.
Many apparently stand to benefit from the development. “About 250,000 residents live within a mile of the proposed park, and its backers see all kinds of ancillary benefits, from health to traffic,” says Foderaro.
QueensWay differentiates itself from the High Line in several ways. For one, the city already owns the land in question, and will not need to acquire it, as it did with the High Line. Also, the project does not call for the reconstruction of “a steel structure... requir[ing] nothing more than the clearing of tracks, the selective removal of trees and the pouring of asphalt” in some places. QueensWay will also welcome bicycles, now prohibited on the High Line. Finally, QueensWay is being promoted as a ‘cultural trail’ that "will be defined by the neighborhoods it passes through” in contrast to the High Line, which re-defined its surrounding neighborhoods.