From Sparks of Brilliance to Waves of Reform

Vinayak Bharne's picture

The other day, a distinguished academic colleague made a provocative argument: That the numerous practices of bottom-up urbanism, now becoming increasingly popular in the academy under the rubrics of “do-it-yourself (DIY) urbanism”; “guerilla urbanism”; “tactical urbanism” etc., are the surest sparks of brilliance and hope for our urban future. That these modest grassroots efforts by activists and non-government organizations are seeing uncanny success on issues, and in places, where formal planning has failed to make any relevant impact. That these efforts continue to remain beneath the radar, and need to be highlighted and brought into mainstream dialogues on the future of our cities.

I agree. In cities heavily controlled by local or national authorities, marginalized communities have long sought to subvert top-down control by providing alternate solutions or defying conventional and permitted practices, often as a reaction to dismal administrative performance. From self-help strategies, micro-finance tactics, and awareness-based interventions, to temporary farmers markets and community gardens, such insurgent efforts challenge our normative ideas of what city-making is. They diffuse socio-cultural differences and multiple professions towards the common advocacy for a better urban future. They transcend political affiliation making them unsettling to many authorities, and this is where their true power lies. India, for instance, has more than 3 million non-government-organizations, more than any other country in the world, and there is no question that the successes of many of these entities with some of the most gripping urban issues – poverty, informal economies, social justice etc. – are things we planning professionals should constantly learn from.

But that said, to what degree do such alternative efforts offer solutions to the myriad other pressing problems plaguing our cities? What about rampant sprawl and rapacious capitalism? What about the looming water crisis? What about the anathema of pollution, grid-locks, and the erasure of rural and agrarian landscapes? What about the debacle of single-use zoning and FAR regulations? These issues are equally pressing, for they are destroying the long-term viability of cities across the world – for the rich and poor - by the minute. They cannot be resolved by modest bottom-up tactics, but by ambitious and visionary long-term planning, where every investment - transit, development, infrastructure, regulation - is synergized as an interdependent socio-economic opportunity. They can only be resolved by clear alternatives towards retooling the same petrified processes that have perpetrated the current urban condition. In cities with the dire need for such large-scale transformation - not just small-scale interventions - tactical urbanism offers only short-term sporadic sparks, instead of a much-needed wave of reform and long-term change. Bottom-up tactics are necessary band-aids for temporary relief, but they are not the antidote to long-term urban health, whether in Mumbai or Los Angeles.

If, as Michel de Certeau has noted, “tactics” are employed by citizens to negotiate daily life in the city, and “strategies” in turn emanate from the state and corporation in the form of government regulation, what we need are mechanisms that will help transition tactics towards strategy. The city of Bogota for instance - thanks to a progressive mayor – has undergone major reforms in infrastructure and public transit. The planning department prioritized the improvement of bike lanes, buses and light rail over vehicular roads. It also simultaneously initiated the first Ciclovia, a weekly event in which over 70 miles of city streets are closed to traffic and opened to walking, biking, recreating, and talking with neighbors and strangers – a concept now picking up in several cities across the United States. Another example is the city of Curitiba’s “Farois de Saber” (Lighthouses of Knowledge) project, wherein fifty brightly colored, lighthouse-shaped towers were built throughout the city’s neighborhoods. They are free educational centers which include libraries, Internet access, and other cultural resources for citizens of all ages, diversifying access to knowledge, and expanding the area of formal education. The most important thing is that all these ideas and initiatives have happened without the necessity of guerilla tactics. These initiatives are truly exemplary, because they emerge from both communities as well as governments, with intimate collaboration from conception to implementation and follow through.

We need bottom-up urbanists and their sparks of brilliance. But we also need simultaneous waves – not sparks – of long-term reform, that will enable catalytic, incremental, systematic and large-scale change beyond isolated interventions, not for a day or a week, but for decades and beyond. The task for us planners is to facilitate these connections; to get citizens and activist-groups to understand the virtues of collaborative planning - to not only support, but demand, expect and embrace progressive change. This indeed is what participatory democracy is all about. It’s not an “either/or” but a “both/and” proposition, with “top-down”, “bottom-up”, “sideways” and “networked” efforts all collaborating towards better cities.  

Vinayak Bharne is Director of Design at Moule & Polyzoides Architects & Urbanists and a joint faculty of urbanism and planning at the Sol Price School of Public Policy and the School of Architecture at the University of Southern California




Great article about groundswell from those who experience their city everyday. That simple fact is why there will always be some type of movement from simple citizens to improve their situation. No matter how big an idea is debated, presented, and finally executed, it is up to those who actually live and breathe those ideas which determine it's ultimate success or lack thereof.

A quick example of a well intentioned idea is that of Le Corbusier's Garden City, in particular the towers in the park schemes. Many large cities across this country decimated entire neighborhoods, albeit most of them in a ruinous, dilapidated state, and built these spanking new towers surrounded by vast green moats in hopes of keeping away the decay. Alas within a generation, those shiny new buildings already started to show signs of fatigue and a generation after that most of them were heading in the same direction as those they replaced. The recent renaissance in some of those same cities has been triggered by the dismantling of some of these 'projects' and a re-building of something akin to what was there historically or at the very least attempting to restitch the urban fabric.

The failure of a big idea such as Le Corbu's takes time to rectify and is usually brought about by those who live and experience it. One of the main reasons it takes time is due to the fact that it is those within the system (public service) who, shall we say, are not always looking out for the best interest of their populace. At times they find themselves conflicted by listening to so-called experts and their constituents, which are sometimes represented as being non-experts.

The populace, out of frustration, finds any means necessary to create change. Some attend city council meetings and exercise their freedom of speech, others create rallies and exercise their right to assemble, and then there are those that go out and simply create by exercising their minds. Each of these goes towards creating a snowball effect, which eventually leads to major changes and the cycle begins once again.

Sideways Urbanism in Good Urbanism

See the chapter "Sideways Urbanism" in my book Good Urbanism.

Prepare for the AICP* Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $245

Essential Readings in Urban Planning

Planning on taking the AICP* Exam? Register for Planetizen's AICP * Exam Preparation Course to save $25.

Get the "Green Bible" of planning books

Understand the complexities of planning at the local level while preparing for the AICP* exam.
Book cover of Where Things Are from Near to Far

Where Things Are From Near to Far

This engaging children's book about planning illustrates that "every building has its place."