Flint looks at the complicated legacy that many of Jacobs' battles have left, from gentrification of Greenwich Village to overzealous Historic Preservation to the scourge of NIMBYism, and ends with a view of her principles as prescient of the Tea Party.
"Perhaps the greatest house-of-mirrors effect lies with the Tea Party, whose activists have been shutting down and disrupting planning meetings and public hearings across the country. Like Jane, these folks are anti-planning. Like Jane, there's a strong libertarian streak. The very tactics that brought about public participation are now being used by those with very different views from the progessive planners with the dog-eared copy of Death and Life on their shelf. Early on, from the battles over Washington Square Park to Lomex, Jane insisted on a singular guiding principle: no compromise. Don't accept the crumbs of mitigation in exchange for acquiescence. She didn't want a smaller highway - she wanted no highway. Jane Jacobs was a Tea Partier."
Thanks to Robert Steuteville
Comments
Jane Jacobs and Tea Party
"She didn't want a smaller highway — she wanted no highway. Jane Jacobs was a Tea Partier."
Find me someplace where the Tea Party is fighting against highways, and I will consider taking this seriously.
You might as well say that Rachel Carson didn't want to compromise - she wanted to ban DDT. Therefore, Rachel Carson was a Tea Partier.
Charles Siegel