Bike Sharing Coming To Hoboken & Jersey City?

Ian Sacs's picture
Blogger

While it is still in the early stages, it's nonetheless exciting to post that Hoboken and Jersey City are collaborating with Hudson County Transportation Management Association (TMA) to explore ways to bring a full-fledged bike sharing program to the west coast of the Hudson.  The full details are posted in a Request for Expressions of Interest (RFEOI) here:

http://www.hudsontma.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=227&cat_id=21&Itemid=61 

Interestingly, the concept includes a strategy that seeks complementary user groups; namely, residential commuters attracted to the transportation hubs during peak periods in the traditional commute directions, and tourists attracted to the NJ waterfront to see the NYC skyline and the Statue of Liberty during the off-peak periods in the reverse-commute directions.  The result, in theory, is a system that could be implemented across a large area and several municipalities that meshes well with existing transport (i.e. ferries in need of off-peak ridership).  The complementary travel patterns are paired to maximize utilization and minimize the need for regular staff-supported redistribution of bicycles.  Kudos to the TMA for taking the leadership role on this!

This effort rides on the coattails of an announcement late last year of a federally-funded bike share program in Newark, NJ via the North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority (NJTPA) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) local Mobility Initiatives program and operated by non-profit organization Meadowlink.  That bike share program is meant to pair commuters with local university students who share complementary commuting patterns.  The strategy here is again to insert bike sharing where the travel patterns can support continued use of the equipment and keep redistribution to a minimum. 

Bike sharing is a critical next step in these, and other urban municipalities, because there is a strong, dense connection between robust transportation centers and surrounding neighborhoods that can be served with a "one size fits all" solution.  Bicycles used in a share model are a tantalizing niche because they take up significantly less space on streets and travel at "human speeds" that are much better matched to urban living than expanded use of automobiles and, in cases where distances are short, even redundant private shuttle systems.  Bicycles are also quiet and contribute nothing to urban pollution and smog concerns.  Still, bike sharing is still relatively new so many of the grander implementations (Paris, London, Montreal, and soon, New York City) are being closely watched in hopes of discovering the best model.

That said, it is hard to imagine that bike sharing will not become a critical option in the urban multi-modal menu of all cities.  In my experience, the greatest practical challenge for expanding bicycle use in urban areas as a transportation option is the limited space residents have to safely keep bicycles at home.  Small city flats in walk-up buildings are simply not ideal for owning and regularly using a bicycle, and many people are unwilling to spend money on a material possession that spends its nights on the street (and doesn't weigh two tons).  Bike sharing circumvents these challenges by making the bicycle available as a "service" rather than a "possession", which eliminates the need to store the bicycle at home and removes the safety/security concerns from the individual.  It also naturally allows bicycles to be used more continuously throughout the day, reducing resource consumption as well as the total number of bicycles in a city (which at some point can become overwhleming as anyone who has witnessed a Shanghai commute can attest!).

While I freely disclose involvement in the preparation of this RFEOI, the efforts are of a much larger group and the results are to the benefit of the participating communitites.  It is exciting to think that such a partnership can allow for a system that promises so much benefit to some of the densest communities in the country.  As with other projects Hoboken has attempted, the hope is that the ideal conditions of our and neighboring cities for demosntrating progressive solutions will serve as a model for how to do the same in so many other places.

Ian Sacs, P.E. is a worldwide transportation solutions consultant based in Finland.

Comments

Comments

Anthony Townsend's picture

great news, but where will commuters ride?

As a resident of Hoboken, and a planner and urban futurist I think this is awesome. And I love what you've done in terms of adding bike lanes and parking around the city.

One thing that I think is overlooked, and could use some attention, is to look at ways the waterfront paths might be re-enginnered/tweaked to create a more unified bicycle thoroughfare. The potential for a commuter-friendly bicycle path from Edgewater to Bayonne is totally feasible - at the very least it should be easy and straightforward to ride from 14th Street in Hoboken to the Jersey City financial district... but it isn't. There are numerous gaps in the path, poor connections, a total lack of consistent signage, etc.

Take the Hudson River parks in Manhattan as a cue... there are good reasons why that path is widely used for bicycle commuters going from upper Manhattan and the Bronx to downtown.

Ian Sacs's picture
Blogger

Ian Sacs Replies

Anthony, this is a true need and desire but it is much more complicated on the NJ side than the NYC side. Hudson River Park is a contiguous, wholly owned city property that was dedicated for public use and included specific "hubs" for generating the funds needed to pay for maintenance (Chelsea Piers, Pier 40, etc.). This is not meant to minimize the arduous task necessary to make the park what it is, but the assemblage of properties happened decades ago and is not nearly the same scenario across the Hudson.

In NJ, there are multiple municipalities, multiple private property owners, and a constant fluctuation in development priorities over the decades necessary to make the entire waterfront a non-stop walk/bike path. Witness the "private" portions with gates and signage that make the unsuspecting visitor feel unwanted or think they may even be trespassing. Even in Hoboken there are segments that are a wide mix of properties currently owned by the city, other public agencies, quasi-public agencies, private developers, and also temporarily by private developers until they complete their work, and that's just one mile!

I think the answer to your question is that continued coordination and expanded relations between waterfront cities with respect to bicycle facilities will eventually make their city streets, including those adjacent to the waterfront, more welcoming and therefore more convenient for bike riders. But this is an incremental process that requires devoted and passionate players in all roles, including public, private, and advocacy.

Interoperable bike share with NYC?

Ian,

Is there any effort to make the bike share system west of the Hudson interoperable with the one planned by NYC?

While a system for Jersey City and Hoboken would be useful, it would pale in comparison to a far more complete system that could allow someone to cycle to/from PATH and pick up a bike on the other side!

Ian Sacs's picture
Blogger

Ian Sacs Replies

Yes, that is the hope. It seems logical that the best system is one that works seamlessly between Hoboken, Jersey City, and that little island to the east. Of course, public contract laws may interfere with the ideal, but we will certainly do our best to strongly encourage (if we can't require) such interoperability.

Prepare for the AICP Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $245
Planetizen Courses image ad

Planetizen Courses

Advance your career with subscription-based online courses tailored to the urban planning professional.
Starting at $16.95 a month
Book cover of the Guide to Graduate Planning Programs 4th Edition

Thinking about Grad School?

New! 4th Edition of the Planetizen Guide to Graduate Urban Planning Programs just released.
Starting at $24.95

City Coasters

Hand-drawn engraved maps of your favorite neighborhoods are divided up across 4 coasters making each one unique.
$36.00