Park51, Planning and the Freedom of Religion

Michael Dudley's picture
Blogger
As planners, we are accustomed to (and expect) some types of urban development proposals to attract controversy. Whether the opposition is to new roads, higher-density housing or undesirable land uses such as industries or prisons, such controversies are becoming far more common as environmental, economic and social issues become more pronounced and widely understood. In most cases, we generally assume that we can make use of a suite of engagement strategies to engage stakeholders and try to resolve typical development conflicts. 

However, the nationwide debate over the proposed Islamic community center at 45 Park Place Manhattan is unprecedented, and well beyond any local development controversy with which any of us have likely dealt. It will surely stand as one of the most significant land use debates in modern planning history – and not at all because of the substantive planning issues involved or the actual merit of the proposal. Rather it will be a landmark debate in terms of how it has been cynically politicized, and how the effects of this manipulation will ripple across the country. While it clearly shows the extent to which 9/11 is a still-open wound, at the same time, it has also exposed a dangerous undercurrent of vitriol, paranoia and racism which threatens to contaminate American society and political discourse for years to come.

Like so many politicized issues, this debate is characterized by virulent and highly misleading rhetoric. The proposed project, the Park51 Islamic Cultural Center is not a mosque, and it is not "at" Ground Zero. It will feature multiple uses, and it is several blocks away, with no view of the WTC site. According to the project website, Park51 is

"dedicated to pluralism, service, arts and culture, education and empowerment, appreciation for our city and a deep respect for our planet...Park51 will grow into a world-class community center, planned to include the following facilities:

  • outstanding recreation spaces and fitness facilities (swimming pool, gym, basketball court)
  • a 500-seat auditorium
  • a restaurant and culinary school
  • cultural amenities including exhibitions
  • education programs
  • a library, reading room and art studios
  • childcare services
  • a mosque, intended to be run separately from Park51 but open to and accessible to all members, visitors and our New York community
  • a September 11th memorial and quiet contemplation space, open to all."

On its merits, this would seem an excellent project for the area, and an exciting reuse of a building that has otherwise sat vacant for 9 years since it was damaged on September 11th 2001. What has transformed this debate beyond the scope of any previous municipal planning issue is not only the raw emotions still felt from the 9/11 attacks, but the extent to which these are being used by the Center's opponents to stoke fear and hatred of a minority group. Stephen Salisbury, author of the recent book Mohamed's Ghosts writes on TomDispatch that:

"The mosque controversy is not really about a mosque at all; it's about the presence of Muslims in America, and the free-floating anxiety and fear that now dominate the nation's psyche. The mere presence of Muslims at prayer is now enough to trigger angry protests Those opposing the construction of the center in New York City are drawing on what amounts to a decade of government-stoked xenophobia about Muslims, now gathering strength and visibility in a nation full of deep economic anxieties and increasingly aggressive far-right grassroots groups."

Salisbury points out that the anti-mosque movement has spread beyond Manhattan to Tennessee, California, Georgia, Kentucky, Wisconsin, and Illinois as well as Brooklyn and Staten Island, where mosque proposals and permit applications are being met with angry protests. The extent of this opposition is so extreme that there are calls for an outright ban on such construction: Bryan Fischer of the influential conservative organization the American Family Association stated that "permits should not be granted to build even one more mosque in the United States of America."

This is clearly getting out of hand, and dangerously so. Places of worship being violently opposed and vilified could easily lead to acts of terrorism. Indeed, we have already seen such this past May in the failed pipe bombing of a mosque in Jacksonville Florida. If present anti-Muslim rhetoric continues to escalate, the consequences could be deadly.

The United States of America was built on multiple freedoms, among them the freedom of religion. Communities of faith need places of worship, so campaigns aimed at denying the right of an established faith to provide for their community through building should be seen as intolerable and condemned.

We must guard against religious bigotry in land use decisions. It may be too late for planners to have much influence over the fate of the Park51 proposal, but we could well see the poisonous legacy of this debate infect our own towns and cities. It is incumbent on planners to defend the rights of American Muslims to plan and build for their growing communities, so that they may be free to practice their faith in places of worship like any other Americans -- as the Founding Fathers intended.

 

 

 

Michael Dudley is the Indigenous and Urban Services Librarian at the University of Winnipeg.

Comments

Comments

The beauty of freedom

I did notice a comment recently from a historian, that these people calling their mosque/cultural center "The Cordoba Centre" could well be a calculated insult that they secretly enjoy, but that most of us do not "get". Cordoba (Spain) has a long history, and the Islamists have longer memories than most of us seem to.

But they should still be free to do so. That is the beauty of the USA. You certainly could not build a "Constantinople Centre" for Christians in Turkey or Indonesia, let alone in Saudi Arabia or Iran.

No Special Meaning to Cordoba and Park51

The use of the name Córdoba is so ambiguous that anyone who wants to find something positive in it can find it, and anyone who wants to find something "secretly" insulting in it can find it. Córdoba has such a long history that the use of city's name has no single discernible meaning, despite whatever meaning critics try to apply to it.

That fact is very much like Park51's supposedly controversial location itself—the project backers' choice of that specific location has no single discernible meaning, despite the victory and middle-finger "meanings" that many project opponents see (or try to see).

It's terribly sad to see so many Americans considering Muslims to be an exception to the USA's traditions of equality and religious freedom and vilifying Park51's backers for proposing nothing more than an Islamic community center on a rather normal New York City street.

Differences Within Islam

From an op-ed in yesterday's New York Times:

"Feisal Abdul Rauf of the Cordoba Initiative is one of America’s leading thinkers of Sufism, the mystical form of Islam, which in terms of goals and outlook couldn’t be farther from the violent Wahhabism of the jihadists. His videos and sermons preach love, the remembrance of God (or “zikr”) and reconciliation. His slightly New Agey rhetoric makes him sound, for better or worse, like a Muslim Deepak Chopra. But in the eyes of Osama bin Laden and the Taliban, he is an infidel-loving, grave-worshiping apostate; they no doubt regard him as a legitimate target for assassination.

For such moderate, pluralistic Sufi imams are the front line against the most violent forms of Islam."

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/17/opinion/17dalrymple.html?_r=1

Being against this mosque because of 9/11 is like being against a Quaker meeting house because of the Spanish Inquisition.

Charles Siegel

Pretty conclusive

That is pretty conclusive.

"....in the eyes of Osama bin Laden and the Taliban, he is an infidel-loving, grave-worshiping apostate; they no doubt regard him as a legitimate target for assassination.

For such moderate, pluralistic Sufi imams are the front line against the most violent forms of Islam......."

Absolutely true. Far more Muslims get killed by Muslim radicals in a given period, over extreme religious "enforcement", than non-Muslims get killed by them. Much of the civilian death toll in Iraq and Afghanistan falls into this category. If this particular Imam is one of that breed, there wouldn't seem to be any negatives about this project. There are many ways of giving the finger to Osama and this looks like another one of them after all.

Not a mosque?

Oh Mr. Dudley, how naive you are to the ways of the world!

Prepare for the AICP Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $199
Planetizen Courses image ad

Planetizen Courses

Advance your career with subscription-based online courses tailored to the urban planning professional.
Starting at $14.95 a month
Wood necklace with city map

City Necklaces

These sweet pendants are engraved on a cedar charm with a mini map of selected cities. The perfect gift for friends and family or yourself!
$28.00
City Plate table setting

New Arrival! City Plates

City downtown cores printed on gorgeous decorative collectible porcelain plates.
$50.00