Planning After Our "Empire of Food"

Michael Dudley's picture
Blogger

 

Recently, a Briton armed with a metal detector uncovered a trove of more than 50,000 Roman coins, which archeologists believe was an ancient farming community's offering to the gods to ensure a bountiful harvest. Our own agricultural practices have moved past any pleas to the gods to incorporate instead an industrial-scale arsenal of petrochemical fertilizers, pesticides and genetic modification.

Yet, as Evan Fraser and Andrew Rimas persuasively argue in their highly entertaining and thought-provoking new book "Empires of Food: Feast, Famine and the Rise and Fall of Civilizations," the results will be the same: an inevitable collapse of the systems of food production and the society dependent upon them.

The literature re-evaluating our relationship with food has grown so substantial in recent years as to almost constitute its own sub-genre. Such authors as Michael Pollan (The Omnivore's Dilemma, In Defense of Food), Karl Weber (Food Inc.), and Eric Schlosser (Fast Food Nation) have all added to a burgeoning collection of titles exploring not only our destructive farming and eating habits, but the newly rediscovered practices of urban agriculture.

That many urban dwellers are clamouring to raise their own chickens is just one indication of the reach this literature is having.

In fact, Empires is the authors' second foray into the field. Fraser, an academic geographer who divides his time between the Universities of Guelph and Leeds, previously collaborated with Boston-based journalist and editor Rimas on 2008's Beef: The Untold Story of How Milk, Meat and Muscle Shaped the World.

Like this previous book, Empires is an engagingly written history with an urgent message about the fragile unsustainability of our agriculture.

According to the authors, it is only through the massive use of artificial fertilizers, manufactured with finite supplies of natural gas, that we have managed to increase our numbers past six billion people.

Peaking fossil fuel supplies, combined with our abuse and destruction of topsoil, climate change and the depletion of aquifers mean that, sooner than we think, the global larder will be empty -- with all that implies for our ability to maintain current population levels.

Fortunately, this truly sobering message is presented with such clever writing, good humour and compelling storytelling that it prevents the book from descending into grim polemic.

The reader is taken on an informative journey through the systems of production, storage, trade and transportation -- those elements necessary for a food empire.

Each factor is given an historical treatment showing how agricultural innovations that may have at first brought bounty eventually delivered decreasing returns and unintended consequences.

The Mesopotamians of the Fertile Crescent constructed irrigation systems that ended up salting their soils; the Romans aggressively overworked their soils to feed a huge urban population and shore up their contracting military empire; and European kingdoms and monasteries deforested the countryside and depleted their soils before a changing climate, famine and the Black Death carried off almost 45 per cent of the population.

Fraser and Rimas demonstrate that any food empire is dependent on the combination of good soil, abundant water, a co-operative climate and a complex (and often inequitable) mesh of socio-political arrangements.

When such conditions exist, civilizations flourish, populations increase, and the associated complexity of that society also expands.

Yet the pendulum always swings back. The very complexity of food empires eventually heralds their collapse.

In the end, the ill-considered and abused interrelationships between nature and society swiftly unravel, as do the civilizations themselves.

The authors enliven this otherwise depressing argument with the recurring picaresque narrative of Francesco Carletti, a hapless 17th-century entrepreneur who set off on a 15-year global voyage to gather and market the foodstuffs of the Caribbean, South America and Asia.

Through Carletti's eyes, we are introduced to all the foods we now blithely take for granted, including chocolate, tea, potatoes and tomatoes. More significantly, the reader is shown how in subsequent centuries these and other comestibles were transformed into industrial commodities dependent upon ecologically devastating farming practices, genocide and exploitative labour conditions.

Between Carletti's tale and other key historical examples, Fraser and Rimas examine the globalized arrangements that fill our supermarkets with an affordable, appealing and seemingly endless supply of groceries and reveal them for what they are and always have been -- a destructive, cruel and doomed illusion.

The alternative, they propose, is a mix of diverse, small-scale farms serving local customers that are nested in a global trading system. Although the authors admit such things are much easier to suggest than realize, Empires of Food is a valuable contribution to a much-needed dialogue on working towards such a transformation.

 

Empires of Food: Feast, Famine and the Rise and Fall of Civilizations
By Evan D.G. Fraser and Andrew Rimas
Free Press, 302 pages, $35
 

Michael Dudley is the Indigenous and Urban Services Librarian at the University of Winnipeg.

Comments

Comments

Planners always preparing for the last war

Once again, we see mounting evidence that our planners are like generals preparing for the LAST war.

A few decades ago, it was exclusionary zoning, which brought everyone a healthier life because it got the people away from the factories and the congested streets of the city. Now instead of celebrating the advances in health that we did achieve, we are lamenting the far less harmful consequences of "auto dependence".

Meanwhile, Switzerland has the highest level of "walking" for transport in the modern world, because they pretty much left their old, mixed-use urban form alone. They possibly foresaw advances in technology solving the health problems without the need for exclusionary zoning.

Now, we have planners in the USA trying to restore high density, walkable living again, but by means that are massively costly in terms of land value inflation and could be even more costly in capital destruction (so costly that it could in fact hardly even start to happen).

And we can foresee a time when people will need to be able to keep fowls and grow their own vegetables? Good luck, inner city apartment dwellers.

And who honestly believes that a few tens of millions of office jobs are even going to be viable at all in the post-fossil-fuel world? Good luck paying the wages of people who sit at computer screens, and keeping the trains running, when you can't even feed everybody. Reminds me of the former USSR.

I might not live long enough to say "told you so" to a planning profession desperately trying to decentralise everybody back to semi-rural urban structures. But remember what old Wodehouse said, young fellers.

What else have I been saying? Subsidised transport for agriculture is a contributor to this problem. If agriculture had to truly pay its way, the effect of DISTANCE on food and produce prices would be much more marked, land values would vary a lot more sensibly, and much more local production would occur. But it is more a question of people living at lower densities where the agriculture is, than of bringing agriculture into the metropolis. The USA will have little problem feeding its people; it has abundant spare land that could be used for low intensity "organic" farming.

Climate change, deforestation

I love this bit:

"......The Mesopotamians of the Fertile Crescent constructed irrigation systems that ended up salting their soils; the Romans aggressively overworked their soils to feed a huge urban population and shore up their contracting military empire; and European kingdoms and monasteries deforested the countryside and depleted their soils before a CHANGING CLIMATE, famine and the Black Death carried off almost 45 per cent of the population....."

My emphasis. The climate changed, all right. It got COLDER. Another suggestion from old Wodehouse for the young fellers who will be around after I'm gone: mankind might once again come to worry about climates getting colder. Meanwhile, stuff grows better in the warm and with lots of CO2 feeding it.

Also, I wonder if these authors paid any attention to the historical phases of humankind and rates of deforestation. The worst deforestation occurred because of hunter-gatherers setting fire to forests to drive prey into the open. The next worst deforestation occurred because of mankind settling and farming the land; this was proportionally far less damaging than the above, but did give rise to massive increases in population. The next worst deforestation occurred because of the burning of wood as a fuel. The use of coal stopped this. The use of modern fertilisers has reversed this, with massive increases in forest cover occurring in the USA and most of the first world.

".....Yet the pendulum always swings back. The very complexity of food empires eventually heralds their collapse.

In the end, the ill-considered and abused interrelationships between nature and society swiftly unravel, as do the civilizations themselves....."

Modern society is completely different to all these historical examples, but does indeed depend very much on fossil fuels. Supply of coal is not a difficulty.

Modern society's biggest problem is illustrated by the former USSR. Misguided planning. Half of what our planners are doing is the wrong thing if "peak oil" is truly a problem. As I said in my other comment, it is a huge mistake to assume that the status quo of jobs distribution, and the location of those jobs, and their pay rates, will hold good. We want walkable communities, all right; but not walkable communities in the middle of concrete jungles that will have to be abandoned at some stage.

Prepare for the AICP Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $199
Planetizen Courses image ad

Planetizen Courses

Advance your career with subscription-based online courses tailored to the urban planning professional.
Starting at $14.95 a month
Book cover of Contemporary Debates in Urban Planning

Contemporary Debates in Urban Planning

Featuring thought-provoking commentary and insights from some of the leading thinkers and practitioners in the field.
$18.95
poster

A Short History of America

From comic book artist Robert Crumb, poster shows how the built environment has changed throughout the decades.
$14.95