<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.planetizen.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Planetizen Interchange</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/blog/feed</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
 
<item>
 <title>Choosing Ignorance is Stupid</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56685</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
People love statistics. They let us understanding the world
beyond our own senses. &lt;em&gt;USA Today&lt;/em&gt;
publishes a daily &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/snapshot.htm&quot;&gt;Snapshot&lt;/a&gt;
which presents a graph of random statistics. Sports talk and business analysis
are dominated by statistics. We measure our progress, or lack thereof, and
compare ourselves with others, based on statistics about our size, activities and accomplishments. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56685&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56685#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/1519">Census</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/995">Data</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/government">Government / Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/26274">Ignorance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/26273">Intelligence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/141">Research</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/7271">statistics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/16740">Surveys</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 09:18:03 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Todd Litman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56685 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Urban Design Graduate Study for Planners</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56641</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
 Each year a lot of students ask me &amp;quot;how can I get a degree in urban design?&amp;quot; This is a very big question but in this blog I outline
some key questions that those interested in urban design in planning need to
consider.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56641&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56641#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/career">Education &amp;amp; Careers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/history">History / Preservation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/landuse">Land Use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/146">Urban Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/urban">Urban Development / Real Estate</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 17:13:54 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ann Forsyth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56641 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Does Twitter Support a Better Global Urbanism?</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56649</link>
 <description>A few weeks ago I had lunch with a friend and fellow urbanist, Bob Ransford. Lunches with Bob are never boring, as we get right into things, and often debate. Bob’s a communications specialist and a longtime member of the Twitteratti (&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/BobRansford&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;@BobRansford&lt;/a&gt;), so amongst discussions about strengthening urbanism in the Cascadia Region, and affordability debates in Vancouver, I asked him a question that’s been on my mind for the last month: Is Twitter a positive tool for global urbanism? Put another way, is twitter facilitating smarter discussions on international city-building, or are we all getting dumber, 140 characters at a time?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56649&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56649#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/technology">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/7106">Twitter</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 09:37:07 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Brent Toderian</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56649 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The True Cost of Driving and Travel Behavior</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56493</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;

Over the past few years a variety of documents ranging from
contemporary media to more serious research efforts have addressed the cost of
auto ownership and use.  These estimates
are often used to address two important transportation issues, the household
benefits of using transit in lieu of auto ownership and/or the consideration of
household location decisions in the context of the total cost of housing and
transportation.  Two often referenced sources of research on
these issues are the Center for Neighborhood Technology’s (CNT) initiatives in
developing a housing and transportatio&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56493&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56493#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/26123">auto cost</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/26124">auto ownership</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/transportation">Transportation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/262">Travel Behavior</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/26122">travel cost</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:31:18 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steven Polzin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56493 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Traffic deaths and safety: who&#039;s really the safest?</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56468</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
William Lucy of the University of Virginia has written
extensively on the question of whether outer suburbs are safer than cities or
inner suburbs; he argues, based on traffic fatality data, that outer suburbs are
certainly less safe than inner suburbs, and maybe even less safe than
cities. (1) 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
However, Lucy’s analysis is not particularly
fine-grained: it analyzes data county-by-county, rather than town-by-town.
What’s wrong with this?  Often, suburban
cities within a county are quite diverse: some share the characteristics of
inner suburbs (e.g. some public transit) while others look more like exurbs.  So I wondered whether there is any significant &amp;#39;safety gap&amp;quot; between inner and outer suburbs. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56468&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56468#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/1410">Exurbs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/13225">inner suburbs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/20089">Outer Suburbs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/social">Social / Demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/269">Traffic Fatalities</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/transportation">Transportation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/urban">Urban Development / Real Estate</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:04:58 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Michael Lewyn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56468 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tea Parties and the Planning of America</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56450</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
I recently had the pleasure of sitting on a panel convened by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lincolninst.edu/&quot;&gt;Lincoln Instititute of Land Policy&lt;/a&gt; to discuss the Tea Party and its effects on local planning (a &lt;a href=&quot;/node/46583&quot;&gt;topic I&amp;#39;ve discussed earlier on this blog&lt;/a&gt;). At one point, the moderator asked if there were any successful techniques that planners could use to effectively deal with Tea Party activists. This was an intriguing question, but also one that I thought was a bit odd. Controversy and conflict are not new to planning; they are built into the very process of American planning because of its inherent openness and inclusiveness.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56450&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56450#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/10549">Conflicts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/government">Government / Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/20437">Local Planning</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/2384">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/26075">politics of planning</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/16791">Tea Party</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:16:02 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Samuel Staley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56450 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Betting on the Enduring Attraction of the Printed Word</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56434</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Like the rare &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huntington.org/huntingtonlibrary.aspx?id=4132&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Corpse flower&lt;/a&gt; that blooms every several years, the Los Angeles chapter of the American Institute of Architects is planning to publish yet &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aialosangeles.org/article/advertising-opportunities-with-larchitecture-aia-la-s-new-annual-full-color-magazine&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a new magazine&lt;/a&gt; exploring and extolling local design, how it impacts “our everyday life,” and “who architects are as people.”  Such an effort at such a time deserves notice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56434&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56434#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/242">AIA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/architecture">Architecture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/26048">LArchitecture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/1013">Los Angeles</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:52:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sam Hall Kaplan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56434 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>USA Today: A Rude Wake-Up Call For Cities</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56360</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
LOGAN AIRPORT, Boston – I’m on my way home from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lincolninst.edu/&quot;&gt;Lincoln Institute of Land Policy’s &lt;/a&gt;Journalists Forum , an annual event, co-sponsored by the Harvard Graduate School of Design and the Neiman Foundation, in which journalists from around the country convene to discuss, jointly, the fate of our industry and the fate of American cities.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56360&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56360#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/25988">Kara Swisher</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/25989">Lincoln Institute</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/social">Social / Demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/technology">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/18076">USA Today</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:07:33 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Josh Stephens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56360 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Was Governor Romney Right Suggesting (Perhaps) that HUD Should Be Eliminated?</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56256</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Set aside whether or not you agree with anything Governor Romney has to say about anything.  Set aside whether or not you think it is axiomatic that the people of the United States need a federal agency generally charged with the mission of housing the poor and attending to urban issues.  
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Candidate Romney may be doing us a favor by putting HUD on the table for us as an American community to evaluate.  It does not matter if the world that favors the elimination of HUD is largely comprised of what Senator McCain called Tea Party Hobbits; the question as to the merit of keeping HUD or not deserves our attention.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56256&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56256#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/community">Community / Economic Development</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/government">Government / Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/housing">Housing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/1282">HUD</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:20:22 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles Buki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56256 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Winds of Change Blow Through APA 2012</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56240</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
As the APA national conference draws to a close after four days of connecting, collaborating, and conversing, another c-word has been running through my head -- change. Of course, introducing and disseminating change is the currency of such conferences, where sessions are intended to facilitate professional development and transition by introducing attendees to the progressive practices and policies being spearheaded across the professional world. I mean, why else would we attend such events? Surely not only for the raucous opening night party, right? Right?? 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
However, it seems there was more than the usual dose of change in the air during this year&amp;#39;s proceedings.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56240&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56240#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/25862">APA 2012</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/community">Community / Economic Development</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/career">Education &amp;amp; Careers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/environment">Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/government">Government / Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/infrastructure">Infrastructure</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/landuse">Land Use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/1013">Los Angeles</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/social">Social / Demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/technology">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/transportation">Transportation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/urban">Urban Development / Real Estate</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:12:31 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jonathan Nettler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56240 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The End of Exurbia? Not Yet </title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56217</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
After the Census Bureau released population estimates showing that core counties were (at least in some metro areas) growing faster than exurban counties, the media was full of headlines about this alleged trend.  An extreme example came from the Washington Post: &amp;quot;An end to America&amp;#39;s exurbia?&amp;quot; (1)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56217&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56217#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/1519">Census</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/1410">Exurbs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/social">Social / Demographics</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:33:06 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Michael Lewyn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56217 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sanitary City vs. Sustainable City - Who Wins, Who Loses?</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56204</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56204&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56204#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/25842">Biophyllia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/environment">Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/1902">Green Urbanism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/17327">planning history</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/151">Sustainability</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 07:48:17 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Walker Wells</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56204 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>City Planning LOLCATS</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56176</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
APA’s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planning.org/conference/program/search/activity.htm?ActivityID=157536&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Fast, Funny, and Passionate&lt;/a&gt; sessions at the national American Planning Association conferences are designed to entertain and educate. I’m serving as the moderator and a speaker at the Sunday morning session. My talk is called “Pin, Post, and Push to Promote Planning.” The purpose is to share lessons about how planners can use social media to promote planning. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56176&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56176#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/humor">Humor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/25694">Lolcat</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:24:16 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jennifer Evans-Cowley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56176 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Youth and the Greatest Love of All….What I Learned From Whitney Houston </title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56125</link>
 <description>As a childhood Whitney Houston fan and former owner of her Greatest Hits cassette tape, her death revived memories of a 13 year old summer camper standing atop a twin bed belting out The Greatest Love of All into a hairbrush microphone. I never really paid much attention to the lyrics until news reports of her death relentlessly played the song--“I believe the children are our future. Teach them well and let them lead the way.” The 13-year old in me always liked that Whitney was singing about my generation, but beyond that, I didn’t quite understand the message. And it wasn’t until last month when I listened to the lyrics and I get it now.  It is our responsibility to prepare our children for their roles in building and shaping our world, our cities, our neighborhoods.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56125&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56125#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/220">Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/career">Education &amp;amp; Careers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/7871">Urban Planning Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/1055">Youth</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:49:01 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Melissa Hege</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56125 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In Greenwich Village: a Case for a Planning Landmark, or, Simply, a Dash of Nostalgia</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56112</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
There is a certain irony in community stalwarts in testy Greenwich Village wanting to have the stale housing slabs hovering over the bland park composing Washington Square Village declared an architectural landmark that will somehow thwart New York University from overdeveloping further the singular super block. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Fugataboutit,” would be a relative polite New Yorker’s observation by anyone who has ever been to this dance before, as I have. The plea is really just a feint to get the retro-redevelopment realists involved into a backroom of one of the proposal’s big buck backers to splice and dice the project so it can be swallowed by all without choking to a political death.  
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56112&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56112#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/14376">Greenwich Village</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/history">History / Preservation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/737">Jane Jacobs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/landuse">Land Use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/329">New York City</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/20482">NYU</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/328">Robert Moses</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/urban">Urban Development / Real Estate</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:54:40 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sam Hall Kaplan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56112 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Unwillingness to Embrace Demand</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56105</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
At a recent meeting in Washington, DC I was astonished at the demonstrated lack of grasp of how neighborhood markets work. This, after all, was a meeting called by supposed experts in revitalization to discuss revitalization with other experts in revitalization.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Notably missing during six hours of painful back and forth rehashing of Great Society pabulum v 5.0 was any sense of what &amp;quot;demand&amp;quot; means.  It&amp;#39;s not just that there was a lack of understanding of demand, for three quarters of a day it was as if the very word - demand - was off limits.  
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56105&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56105#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/community">Community / Economic Development</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:42:10 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles Buki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56105 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Avoiding Undesirable Self-Fulfilling Prophecies</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56017</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
Planners strive to anticipate future needs, which sometimes creates self-fulfilling prophecies: by preparing for a situation we help cause it. This
is particularly true of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm100.htm&quot;&gt;automobile
dependency&lt;/a&gt;. Planning decisions intended to accommodate automobile travel
can create a cycle of increased vehicle travel, more automobile-oriented planning, and reduced alternatives. This concept is conveyed brilliantly in the cartoon below, drawn
by transportation engineer Ian Lockwood and published in the March 2012 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ite.org/itejournal/index.asp&quot;&gt;ITE Journal&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/56017&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/56017#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/16125">Automobile Dependency</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/25729">School Transport Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/10043">Transport Planning</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/transportation">Transportation</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:36:28 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Todd Litman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56017 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Getting into Planning School: How Much do Transcripts Matter?</title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/55987</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
I’ve had a lot of questions lately from students about how
important transcripts are in the graduate admissions process. Your application
to graduate school is one of the few times anyone will actually read your
undergraduate transcript so it has some importance. However, how much it
matters depends on a variety of factors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/55987&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/55987#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/career">Education &amp;amp; Careers</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 09:32:19 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ann Forsyth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">55987 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More logical fallacies in planning policy </title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/55960</link>
 <description>A couple of weeks ago, Todd Litman made a blog entry on
logical fallacies in planning.*   After
looking at the list of possible fallacies at the end of his post, I thought I would show some
(hopefully not too common) examples of these fallacies: 
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Ad hominem&lt;/strong&gt; (arguing against the person rather than the
argument) – “Smart growth is in the U.N&amp;#39;s Agenda 21 so we have to fight it to stop the U.N&amp;#39;s plan to socialize the world.”  “Concern about urban
containment is just another example of Tea Party extremism.”
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Anageon&lt;/strong&gt; (relying on inevitability)- “Sprawl is inevitable,
so there’s nothing we can do about it.”
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/55960&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/55960#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/environment">Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/25473">Fallacies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/humor">Humor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/infrastructure">Infrastructure</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/landuse">Land Use</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/25472">Logic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/social">Social / Demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/transportation">Transportation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/urban">Urban Development / Real Estate</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:25:46 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Michael Lewyn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">55960 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Revitalize our Cities? Yes We Cannes! </title>
 <link>http://www.planetizen.com/node/55913</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Last week my family and I took in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canneslions.com/&quot;&gt;2011 Cannes Lions
International Festival of Creativity&lt;/a&gt; (more commonly referred to as the Cannes
Commercials), the annual celebration of the best in filmed advertising. The
winning ads were, as usual, an entertaining mix of the hilarious, risqué and
the moving, and afforded the viewer the chance to be exposed to diverse film
styles (and unfamiliar products) from around the world.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetizen.com/node/55913&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.planetizen.com/node/55913#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/community">Community / Economic Development</category>
 <category domain="http://www.planetizen.com/taxonomy/term/6264">Media</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:26:42 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Michael Dudley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">55913 at http://www.planetizen.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

