The conventional progressive wisdom is that the Trump Administration will be bad for cities and for transit users. But in recent decades, a unified Republican government has been better for public transit than a divided government.
An efficient and equitable transport system must be diverse to serve diverse travel demands. Planners need better tools to quantify and communicate the benefits of walking, cycling and public transit to sometimes skeptical decision makers.
The terms Central city, Inner city and urban have long been
synonymous with the poorer, disadvantaged minority sections of metropolitan
areas. Conversely, the suburbs have been associated with whites, affluence and
job growth. For a long time, however, this dichotomy has failed to capture the
gradual blurring of distinctive patterns that demarcate city from suburb. A
report by Kenya Covington, Michael Stoll and yours truly underscores this
point. The Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program, the single largest affordable
housing program in the country is almost as prevalent in the suburbs as in
One of the greatest challenges for US cities is the
perceived failure of public schools. Both as a means for attracting and
retaining the middle class and for providing upward mobility public schools are
crucial. Consequently, any effort to build livable cities must include
successful public schools so as to provide a ladder for the poor and to attract
and retain the middle class. Although education typically falls out of the
purview of planning, planners can ill afford to ignore such a key component of
what makes a place livable in the minds of many.
Does the New York City Housing Authority’s (NYCHA) decision
to tear down Prospect Plaza, a high rise development in Brownsville Brooklyn,
portend the demise of public housing in New York City as we know it?
It was the collapse of the housing bubble that triggered the current economic crisis. As is the case in the aftermath of many calamities finger pointing abounds. There are an ample number of would be culprits. Take your pick; The Federal Reserve for keeping interest rates too low, mortgage brokers for pushing inappropriate loans, ratings agencies for blessing dubious securities, the list goes on. A common criticism aimed at all of these culprits is that they lacked the foresight to see the inevitable housing bust. It was the housing bubble that camouflaged all of the bad decisions.
The on-going foreclosure and subsequent credit crisis should
offer important lessons for housing policy and public policy more broadly. Chief
among these lessons might be the falsity of the notion that government regulation
is always bad.But some conservative
commentators cling to the dogma that government intervention is the root of all
evil. An explanation being offered by some is that government intervention in
the form of Community Reinvestment Act encouraged irresponsible lending and led
to the subsequent housing bust.
Deindustrialization has wreaked havoc across many American
cities and towns.One only need visit
the landscape of the rust belt, places like Buffalo, Detroit or Flint, Michigan
to get a sense how damaging this transformation can be.Behind the ugly ruins of abandoned factories
and shuttered stores are the lives of real people who have suffered.Manufacturing provided jobs, good paying ones
at that, that helped create a blue collar middle class.
The Federal Reserve’s bailout (arranged liquidation to some) of Bear Stearns over the weekend seriously calls into question the headlong march toward neoliberalism that has been ascendant for the past few decades.
Last Year Planetizen published their first Guide to Graduate Urban Planning Programs.The Guide includes basic information about the programs (location, specializations, faculty, etc) and an overall ranking of the schools and ranking by specialization.It is these rankings that are the source of much consternation within the planning academy.
This year in Parents Involved in Community Schools Inc. v. Seattle School District and Meredith v. Jefferson County (Ky.) Board of Education the Supreme Court ruled that school districts could not assign students on the basis of race, even if the goal was to promote integration.To some this is the end of an era, with affirmative action and other diversity promoting programs in jeopardy as the court has now come full circle using the Brown decision to outlaw programs that promote integration.Most commentators on this ruling have highlighted the implications for school integration programs and even affirmative action more broadly.But the ruling also speaks to an issue pertinent to planners as well—racial segregation in American cities, and by racial segregation I am referring to the segregation of African Americans who are by far the most segregated group in America.
Although the latest immigration bill being debated upon in congress has attracted relatively little attention from planners, the planning implications of reforming or not reforming current immigration policy are huge.Immigration impacts labor markets, and thereby commuting patterns, transportation planning and economic development.Immigration swells the population of many cities and towns forcing planners to rethink their plans for housing, schools and other public services.Often overlooked, however, is f immigration’s impact on the planning process itself.